Wait, maybe the user wants to create a more complex spintax structure where each original option is replaced by a sub-spintax with three choices. For example: i So each original option (x, y, z) is now a group of three. Then, when the spintax is spun, it would pick one of the groups and then one from that group. That way, the total number of options is 3 groups, each with 3 options. But perhaps the user is looking for a different approach. Maybe just replacing each original word with three synonyms. For example, if the original is apple, replace each with three alternatives, leading to fruit2 but that's not clear.
Wait, but that's combining all into one group. But the original had three groups. Maybe the nested approach is better. Let me Video nina evans strip
Then the spintax becomes: