The challenge is to ensure that for each word, there are at least two available synonyms. If not, the output might be truncated or repeated. Also, the user might not want to replace proper nouns, but their instruction says "keep names intact," which could imply that proper nouns should be left as is. However, the example includes "example," which is a common noun. So maybe the instruction is to process all words except proper nouns, but the user didn't specify that. Alternatively, "keep names intact" might mean that if a word is a name (proper noun), it should not be replaced, and just kept in the block without synonyms. But the user's instruction says "every word with 3 synonyms," so perhaps all words should be processed, regardless of type. The example does not include a proper noun, so maybe the user is not concerned about that and just wants to process all words, assuming that synonyms exist for all.
But the user says "Keep names intact." Maybe that means if it's a proper noun (like John, London), don't replace them with synonyms. However, the instruction says "every word with 3 synonyms," so perhaps names are included. This is a bit confusing, but the example doesn't include a name. I'll assume that all words are to be processed, regardless of being proper nouns or common nouns. If a name like "John" is processed, we might end up with John if no synonyms are available, but the user might not expect that. However, the user didn't provide any specific information on handling names, so I'll proceed as per the given instruction. tamil actress kushboo blue film video
Okay, the user wants me to take their text and format every word with three synonyms, keeping the original words intact. They want the result in a specific format using v2 for each word. The challenge is to ensure that for each