I should also consider the number of synonyms. Three variants per term. Some terms might not have three common synonyms. In that case, maybe provide the best three available. If a word has only one synonym, perhaps use the same word as a fallback, but that's risky. Alternatively, maybe omit it, but the user wants three variants each time.
3. If proper noun: generate three alternative names/abbreviations. www.1TamilBlasters.pm - Sethupathi I.P.S -1994-...
- If common word, provide three synonyms. I should also consider the number of synonyms
But the user might be testing me with a hypothetical. Let me think. For example, if the input was "The company launched a new app called Apple," then "company" could be replaced with firm, "launched" with introduced, "new" with fresh, "app" with program, and "called" stays the same if it's a proper noun. Wait, "Apple" here is a proper noun, so it remains. In that case, maybe provide the best three available
1. Tokenize the text into terms/words.
Therefore, the approach is:
So, for example, in a sentence like "Apple released a new iPhone," "Apple" is a proper noun, so replace it with Apple Inc.. "released" is a verb, so find three synonyms like debut. "new" is an adjective, so latest. "iPhone" is a proper noun as well (product name), so maybe iPod touch — but that's not synonyms, it's different products. Wait, that's not correct. So perhaps the user wants product names to be left as is if they are proper nouns, but in the example, "Apple" is a company name, which is a proper noun. So maybe for product names, also considered proper nouns, so no changes. But in the example, "Apple" became "Apple Inc.|AAPL|the company," so maybe the user wants variations on the reference to the entity, not synonyms. So the instruction is to replace every term with three variants, but for proper nouns, the variants are different names or abbreviations. For non-proper nouns, synonyms.