If I don't have the actual text, perhaps I should wait for the user to provide it. But since the user's latest message is instructing me, maybe I need to prompt them for the text. However, looking at the history, the user might be asking for a general example. Let me proceed with a hypothetical example to showcase how the output would look, assuming they provide a text. Let's say the input text is "Alice visited London after she finished her work." The proper nouns "Alice" and "London" remain. The rest: "visited," "after," "she," "finished," "her," "work." Each of these words would be replaced with three alternatives in spintax format. For example: "visited" becomes roamed, "after" becomes subsequent to, and so on. The final output would be "Alice roamed subsequent to she finished her task." But need to check if "finished" has three suitable synonyms and if the word count is accurate.
Another point: the user might want the output as text only, no markdown, and skip any proper nouns. So, in the output, proper nouns stay the same, other words get their three alternatives. Let me make sure to structure the response correctly. The user also mentioned "Output text only," so I need to avoid any extra explanations.
Wait, looking back at the history, the user's first message is an instruction for the task. So perhaps the next step is to wait for the user to provide the text they want modified. But in the current query, they just said "Text:" followed by my response. Maybe there was a formatting error or an interruption.
But the challenge is identifying proper nouns correctly. How do I determine if a word is a proper noun without the actual text? Also, the user wants three alternatives for each non-proper noun. Do they want actual synonyms, or just three words in curly brackets with a specific structure? For example, replacing "cat" with cat? But the user might want the alternatives to be different words, not just variations of the same word.