Wait, the user's own example shows that. Let me check the user's example again. The input text has "The connection between lag switches and UnknownCheats is a strong one." The user's example output would be something like Connection amongst latency switches and UnknownCheats is the strong item. But "UnknownCheats" is a proper noun, so it stays as is. So each word is processed individually.
Okay, let's tackle this user's request. First, the user wants me to revise each word in the provided text with three synonyms, using the syn3 format. They mentioned keeping names intact, so I shouldn't change "UnknownCheats" or any other proper nouns. They also want the result only, no additional text. lag switch unknowncheats
Wait, the user's example shows that in the input, they have "lag switches" and they want each word to have synonyms. So "lag" becomes lag, "switches" becomes devices. So in the spintax, it would be delay devices? But that's two words. The user's example only shows a single word with three options. So maybe they want each word individually. So "lag switches" would split into two words in spintax? But the user's instruction says "update all words with 3 synonyms in spintax: x". So each word in the text is replaced by its three synonyms in spintax. So for each word, replace it with y, where x, y, z are synonyms. Wait, the user's own example shows that