However, in the example given, they changed "reputable sources" and "movie" but kept other words. Wait, the example provided by the user shows the original text and the edited version. For instance, "movie" becomes video, but only if there's a term that can have three options. So, I need to identify all such terms in the user's text.
Wait, in the conclusion, the example changed "Telugu" and "720p" to three options each. So I need to check if there are other terms in the original text that can be generalized like that. vasa diagnost skacat- besplatno polnuu versiu
Alternatively, perhaps the user made a typo and the intention was to extract all multi-option terms with their possible options, forming triplets where possible. Given the strict instructions, the assistant should follow the format even if there are not three options. But the user's instruction says "all terms with 3 options as word3". Therefore, if a term has three options, then format. If not, maybe skip? But the example given includes two options in the text, but the user wants triplets. This is conflicting. However, in the example given, they changed "reputable