Given the ambiguity, the safest approach is to consider that the entire product name "ACDSee Pro 7.1.164 Incl. KeyMaker-CORE - Deepsta" is a brand name and should be kept intact. Therefore, parts like "Incl.", "KeyMaker-CORE", and "Deepsta" are part of the brand and should not be altered. Thus, only the words outside the brand name should be replaced.
Looking at the structure: each main point has a title and explanation. I'll apply spintax to the titles first. "Improved Productivity" becomes Increased Effectiveness. Then, the explanations. Words like "performance" can be swapped with "speed" or "functionality". The phrase "streamlined interface" might become "optimized layout" or "simplified design". ACDSee Pro 7.1.164 Incl. KeyMaker-CORE -deepsta...
The instruction is a bit ambiguous here. If "Incl." is part of the product title, maybe it's part of the brand name. However, in the original text, "Incl." is part of the title, such as "ACDSee Pro 7.1.164 Incl. KeyMaker-CORE - Deepsta". Here, "Incl." might be a prefix indicating that KeyMaker-CORE is included. Since it's not a brand name itself, perhaps it should be replaced. However, the user said to "keep brand names", and the entire title is considered a brand. So maybe we need to treat the entire product name as a brand and not replace any words in it. Alternatively, "Incl." is just part of the title and could be replaced. This requires careful judgment. Given the ambiguity, the safest approach is to
I need to make sure that the brand names are preserved and only the surrounding words are replaced with their synonyms. Let me go through the replacements again to ensure accuracy. Also, check if there are other brand names that might have been missed. In the text provided, "ACDSee Pro" and "Deepsta" seem to be part of the product title, so they should remain unchanged. Thus, only the words outside the brand name
Starting with "By" – alternatives could be "Through|Using|Via".