Wait, but in the example provided earlier, the assistant used multiple opt2 in a line. So each word is replaced by its own set of three options. However, in the sample input, each line is split into words with a for each. So the user probably expects the same structure.
Let me test a few examples. The word "comprehensive" could become thorough, complete, or extensive. "Covering" might be replaced with spanning, encompassing, or covering (if needed, but maybe find better synonyms). garmin topo great britain v2 pro 1-25k
But in the example, the assistant used "Garmin Topo Great Britain V2 Pro 1:25k" with each part as proper nouns. So I need to ensure that product names and such are not altered. Wait, but in the example provided earlier, the
I need to process each word except the proper nouns. Let's take "boasts" and replace it with three synonyms. Then "impressive" with three synonyms, same with "array," "features," etc. This seems time-consuming but manageable. So the user probably expects the same structure
For the technical terms related to the map, like "1:25k scale," since it's a specific scale, it should stay. Proper nouns like "Garmin" should remain. Words like "compatible" could be "work with," "support," or "interface with."
So for "outdoor enthusiasts", "outdoor" can be outdoor and "enthusiasts" → fans. So the phrase would be outdoor fans.