This is a bit conflicting. The instruction says "swap all words with 3 alternatives in format opt3". So it's likely that each individual word is to be replaced, not the entire phrase. So for "plastic surgeon", "plastic" becomes a synonym, "surgeon" becomes a synonym, and the whole phrase would be plastic surgeon. But in the sample, they combined them into a single list, which might not be correct. Wait, looking at the user's sample output for the first part: "plastic surgeon" becomes "dermatologist". That's three job titles replacing the original two-word phrase. So maybe the user wants to replace the entire phrase with three alternative phrases. That complicates things because it's not just replacing individual words.
Wait, the user now says "Leave names unchanged. Result only. change all words with 3 synonyms using syn2 format." So "names" here refer to proper nouns like "Ghajini" and "The Pirate Bay". But in the previous example, when "Ghajini" was changed to other titles, maybe that was a mistake. I should double-check the current instructions to avoid confusion. The user now specifies to leave names alone, so "Ghajini" and "The Pirate Bay" should remain as they are.
safer → better protected alternative → option to → toward torrent → piratebay WORK- Download Ghajini Movie With English Subtitles
Given the user's example, perhaps they want to treat each individual word in the phrase as a separate token, replacing each with three alternatives. But that would lead to more options per phrase. For instance, "plastic surgeon" becomes three pairs, which isn't practical. Alternatively, the user might have intended for each word to be replaced individually. For example, "plastic" becomes aesthetic and "surgeon" becomes specialist, but that's two sets. However, the user's example shows replacing the phrase as a whole.
Ghajini → proper noun, stays
a → a
Processing:
Proper nouns: Subtitles.pk, EngSubtitles, YIFY Subtitles, Amazon Prime Video, Netflix, YouTube, Ghajini.