1. xbox_init => xbox_init 2. xbox_send_command => xbox_send 3. xbox_recv_response => xbox_receive 4. xbox_close => xbox_close
In the initial user message, the code includes functions like xbox_init(), which would be replaced with three variants separated by Download - ExtraMovies.my - Despicable Me 4 -2...
#include => #include #include => #include #include => #include xbox_recv_response => xbox_receive 4
But given that the original includes are in the code, and the user wants every term modified, perhaps they should be replaced. Let me think. The string "GET /xbox/version" might need variants, but
The string "GET /xbox/version" might need variants, but wait, it's a proper noun as a URL path, so "xbox" is a proper noun. But maybe the path parts can be varied. Hmm, the user said no changes to proper nouns. So "xbox" should stay. But perhaps the path can be changed. The user might not consider the URL path as proper nouns. I need to check the instruction again: "No changes to proper nouns. Text only." So maybe only changing the variable names or functions, not the URLs. But the user might consider the function names as the terms to change. The code has variables like "response", which is part of the code and maybe a term to vary. Wait, the user wants every term modified with three variants. So each identifier in the code (function names, variable names) should have three alternatives.