For technical terms like "rendering", alternatives could be visualizing. "Visualization" → display.
Also, in the system requirements: "64-bit Intel or AMD processor" could be options for the processor brand. "NVIDIA or AMD graphics card" might become NVIDIA. Let me check the system requirements again. The user wants all terms with three options. The processor line says "64-bit Intel or AMD", so maybe adding another brand. "Graphics: NVIDIA or AMD" could add Intel as the third option. So AMD for processor and Intel for graphics? Wait, but in the original, the options are Intel or AMD for processor, and NVIDIA or AMD for graphics. To make three options each, maybe AMD for processor, but Qualcomm isn't common for desktop. Maybe AMD isn't right. Hmm, perhaps just using the two brands and adding a third common one isn't possible. Wait, but the user wants all terms with three options. The original text has two options. So I need to add a third. Maybe for processor: ARM though ARM is less common in this context. Alternatively, use a more generic term. Wait, the user wants proper nouns to stay and others to be in the options. So maybe Qualcomm but again, not standard. Maybe the user expects to add a third, maybe generic terms. Alternatively, perhaps for the processor part: Intel but "other" is a proper noun? No, "other" is a pronoun. Hmm, tricky. Wait, the user might not have specific options in mind, so maybe just use three possible brands even if one is a stretch. Let me check the system requirements again. Maybe the user expects to use three options for each. So processor: AMD even if ARM isn't common. Graphics: NVIDIA as those are common GPU manufacturers. Maybe that's acceptable. 3ds Max 2022 2021 Xforce
This is a lengthy process. I need to go through each word in the text and provide three alternatives. Proper nouns like "3ds Max", "Autodesk", "Xforce" remain unchanged. For technical terms like "rendering", alternatives could be