"that" – that – "that" included.
"I" – maybe better to keep "I" as one of the options. So I? Wait, "I" is the subject pronoun, while "me" is the object. Maybe the user wants synonyms, so perhaps "I" can stay as one and have similar pronouns. For example, in some contexts, "one" can be used, but not sure. Alternatively, maybe "the user", but that's a proper noun. Hmm, tricky. Let's go with I as the alternatives, even though "me" is the object form. Maybe the user is okay with that as alternatives, even if they change the grammatical function.
So the correct format would be replacing each word with three alternatives in curly braces. Each word in the original sentence is replaced with three options. Now, the user's example might have the original word included in the three, but let's check if that's acceptable. Since the instruction says "no changes to proper nouns", and all words here are non-proper, we can include the original as one of the options if necessary. However, the user might prefer the alternatives to be different. For example, for "can’t", maybe instead of including "can't", use "cannot", "unable", "not able". But the user might not mind if the original is included. It's better to include the original as one option to ensure that the alternatives are valid.
Next, go through each word and think of three synonyms or alternatives. Let's break it down:
2022 Bütün hüquqlar qorunur