"Vocal Performance" can be singing act, but since it's a title, maybe keep it as is. Wait, the user said to rephrase each term, so maybe "Vocal Performance" becomes vocal display. But since it's a title in the example, maybe leave it as is. Wait, in the example, the user used "Vocal Performance" as a title but then rephrased each part. Hmm. Let me check the example again.
I need to ensure that each word in the original text is replaced with three synonyms in the b format, maintaining the structure of each sentence. Also, check if there are any punctuation marks or HTML entities like ’ that need to be handled. The user provided the original text with entities like ’ and “. Should those be converted when rephrasing? The instruction says to rephrase every word with synonyms, so the entities themselves aren't words, but the surrounding text should be rephrased. For example, "Rihanna’ is actually "Rihanna's" – I should treat it as "Rihanna's" or "Rihanna’s" but since it's a possessive, maybe rephrase the entire phrase if necessary, but the user says proper nouns stay. Wait, "Rihanna's" is a possessive, so the possessive form is part of the proper noun? Or is it part of the sentence structure? The user said proper nouns (names and titles) stay. So "Rihanna's" would be considered as part of the proper noun, so leave it as is. But the user's instruction is to rephrase every word otherwise. Hmm, tricky. Wait, the user says: "Proper nouns stay." So names, places, titles. So all parts of the name stay, including possessive forms. So "Rihanna’s" is part of the proper noun, so leave as is. But in the original text, there are HTML entities like ’ which should be replaced as is? Or does the user want the rephrased text to have the same HTML entities? The example output the user provided (if any) would help, but since they didn't give one, I have to assume that in the rephrased version, the possessive forms can be rephrased. Wait, no. The instruction is to rephrase every word with three synonyms, but proper nouns stay. So "Rihanna’s" is a name with possessive, which is a proper noun? Or is the possessive part of the sentence structure? This is a bit ambiguous. Let me check the original instruction again: "Proper nouns stay. Only output text." So perhaps possessive forms are considered part of the sentence, not proper nouns. Hence, "Rihanna’s" would be treated as a word (the apostrophe is a punctuation mark, but the main part is the proper noun). But the user says to rephrase every word with three synonyms, except proper nouns. So maybe "Rihanna’s" is part of the sentence structure to be rephrased. For example, the original sentence "Rihanna’s “American Oxygen” is a powerful..." might need to rephrase the possessive. But "Rihanna’s" is a contraction of "Rihanna is," so perhaps it's better to leave it as a proper noun. This requires careful handling.
First, I need to go through each word in the text. But wait, they mentioned "words" but the example includes phrases and proper nouns. However, the instruction says to skip brands and names, like "Rihanna" and "Boi-1da". So, perhaps they mean to replace non-proprietary nouns with synonyms or related terms. But the user's example shows that they replaced each significant word, even parts of phrases, with alternatives, keeping some as-is if they're names. Rihanna American Oxygen Mp3 Download 320kbps Zip- For
Then "we will also discuss the song’s background, its significance, and why it remains a fan favorite."
Another example: "popular websites for downloading mp3 files" → well-known platforms for obtaining digital music . Each part is correctly replaced. "Vocal Performance" can be singing act, but since
Spintax: A tune's verses discuss topics of self, tradition, and the US experience.
Given this ambiguity, perhaps it's safer to leave all instances of "Rihanna’s" and the song titles as they are, since they are part of proper nouns. The same applies to the song titles in quotes. Wait, in the example, the user used "Vocal
In the sample, the song title "American Oxygen" is unchanged, but when "American" appears in the text as an adjective, like in "American experience", they replaced it with USian. So the approach is to leave the song title as-is but replace the adjective when it's not part of a title. That's important.
