Assuming that the user's intention is to redact proper nouns, but according to the instruction, they should be skipped. Therefore, in the current task, I should not modify proper nouns. However, the example given by the user in their initial message shows that they were modified. Therefore, maybe the instruction is to replace proper nouns with some generic terms as a redaction. So the user's instruction might be inconsistent, but based on their example, redacting proper nouns is the way to go.
¿Por qué leer “Iniciación a la Estudio”?
Verifica de que un sitio web u la fuente que eliges sea fiable asi como libre, con el fin prevenir conflictos con malware o malware. Comprueba haya el volumen sea esa versión verdadera y raramente alguna copia pirata. Honre las derechos de escritor asi como evita compartas ese obra sin del autor u del responsable con respecto a esos derechos. Assuming that the user's intention is to redact
I'll need to go through each sentence, break down each word, and substitute them with three variants. Let's take the first example line step by step.
Each of these words (except Google, "PDF", "descargar") should have three variants. For example: Therefore, maybe the instruction is to replace proper
Busca | en | un | motor | de | búsqueda | como | Google | el | título | del | libro | y | el | autor | junto | con | la | palabra | “PDF” | o | “descargar” | .
Next, the second sentence:
Then they provided an example where they replaced the author's name. But the instruction says to skip proper nouns, which might mean that proper nouns are not to be modified. However, in the example, the assistant replaced the proper noun. Maybe the user wants to redact proper nouns instead of modifying them. So for proper nouns, replace them with placeholders. But the user's instruction is conflicting here. "Skip proper nouns" would mean not to modify them, but the example shows they were replaced. This is a bit unclear.